A Review of Fourth Amendment Decisions from the Ohio Supreme Court (2016–2026)

An examination of Ohio Supreme Court Fourth Amendment decisions over the past decade reveals consistent patterns in the Court’s analytical approach. A review of nineteen cases decided between 2016 and 2026 revealed that seventy-four percent (74%) were decided in favor of the State, while twenty-six percent (26%) favored the defendant. To determine whether any patterns […]

A Review of Fourth Amendment Decisions from the Ohio Supreme Court (2016–2026) Read Post »

One Trial or Four? Ohio Supreme Court Resolves Severance Dispute

In State v Reed, the Supreme Court of Ohio has ruled that a man convicted of sexually abusing four minors will remain sentenced, holding that the charges were properly tried together rather than in separate trials. Justice R. Patrick DeWine authored the opinion of the court, joined by Chief Justice Sharon L. Kennedy and Justices

One Trial or Four? Ohio Supreme Court Resolves Severance Dispute Read Post »

State: “Judge, we have no objection to the request for an expungement.” Judge: “But I do!”

Ohio Revised Code Section 2953.32 provides an avenue for relief for citizens saddled with the stigma of a past conviction. The statute sets forth the procedure and requirements for expunging or sealing a criminal record. It mandates that an individual may apply to have their record sealed or expunged as long as the convictions are

State: “Judge, we have no objection to the request for an expungement.” Judge: “But I do!” Read Post »

A five-year long indictment will stand unchanged: The Third District Court of Appeals upholds a conviction against an Ohio man for which the state took over five years to indict

On October 29, 2024, defendant Michael “Mike” Toney was sentenced to an indefinite prison term of eight to twelve years after being found guilty of involuntary manslaughter. On September 10, 2018, an unresponsive female was found inside her home, and the cause of death was later determined to be a fentanyl overdose. The victim’s cellphone

A five-year long indictment will stand unchanged: The Third District Court of Appeals upholds a conviction against an Ohio man for which the state took over five years to indict Read Post »

Does a Police Officer’s Promise During a Traffic Stop Matter? A Potential Limitation on Searches Left Unanswered by the Ohio Supreme Court

In February 2026, the Ohio Supreme Court declined jurisdiction in State v. Smith, leaving unresolved a potential limitation on vehicle searches during roadside traffic stops. An Unfortunate Turn of Events and A ‘Loss’ at the Lower Court In May 2021, police in Grove City, Ohio stopped Raetta Smith after observing her vehicle strike a curb

Does a Police Officer’s Promise During a Traffic Stop Matter? A Potential Limitation on Searches Left Unanswered by the Ohio Supreme Court Read Post »

Missed Mail, Missed Deadline: Appeal Ends Before Ohio’s High Court Can Review It

A Muskingum County man who argued that his lawyer had a conflict of interest — thereby depriving him of a fair trial — will not receive review from the Supreme Court of Ohio. In a short entry dated February 17, 2026, the Court denied Marques Parker’s request to file a delayed appeal and dismissed his

Missed Mail, Missed Deadline: Appeal Ends Before Ohio’s High Court Can Review It Read Post »

Ohio Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case that Would Clarify Indigent Parents’ Right to Counsel and Right to Transcripts at State’s Expense

The involuntary and permanent termination of parental rights has been equated to “‘the family law equivalent of the death penalty,’” and as such, indigent parents in custody proceedings are equipped with certain constitutional rights, such as the right to counsel. But what rights do indigent parents have in matters that deal with temporary or non-permanent

Ohio Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case that Would Clarify Indigent Parents’ Right to Counsel and Right to Transcripts at State’s Expense Read Post »

Two Crashes, Two Months Apart, One Trial: Court’s Merger and Joinder Errors Result in Reversals for Defendant

A Cleveland man receives potential relief from the Cuyahoga County Appellate Court after two separate police chases were tried together. On July 26, 2022, at 11:00 p.m., Jayson Mitchell was stopped by a Cleveland Heights patrolman for speeding. As the patrolman approached the driver’s side window, Mitchell took off in his SUV. The Patrolman pursued,

Two Crashes, Two Months Apart, One Trial: Court’s Merger and Joinder Errors Result in Reversals for Defendant Read Post »

Scroll to Top